National consultant to conduct the review of the Moldovan regulatory framework related to the area of judicial expertise and experts (A2J Project).Vacancy Number: Pr20/01997
Contacts: Ms. Victoria Muntean. victoria.muntean@undp.orgBackground
The UNDP project “Strengthening Efficiency and Access to Justice in Moldova” (A2J) is a multi-year institutional development project designed to contribute to an increased efficiency of justice services and to improved access to justice of men and women in Moldova, in particular from vulnerable and marginalized groups, through enhanced capacities of forensic institutions to provide qualitative justice services, strengthened capacities of the justice sector actors in the selected pilot areas to provide coordinated response to men’s and women’s justice needs and strengthened civil society able to claim the respect of rights and engage in a constructive dialogue with the justice chain actors. Project interventions will offer and encourage equal opportunity for the participation of men and women. Although important efforts have been deployed at national level during the last years to advance the efficiency, transparency, fairness and accessibility of the justice sector , improvement is further required to ensure coherent coordination among law enforcement, security and justice institutions for effective administration of justice, so that men and women, particularly from marginalized or minority groups, are able to claim their rights and access justice effectively. The national forensic institutions are an integral part of the justice system, as the expert opinions provided by these institutions are critical for the objective and evidence-based delivery of justice. The quality and accuracy of forensic investigations and examinations have an extensive impact on the quality of justice and affect the overall perception of users about the justice system. Despite their importance for the administration of justice, forensic institutions benefited from limited assistance and support in their modernization endeavours as compared to other justice chain actors. A new Law on the Judicial Expertise and the Status of Judicial Expert had entered into force at the end of 2016[1], introducing a new regulatory framework and the requirements on the functionality of the judicial expertise system on such issues, as the coordination and methodological mechanisms, admission to the judicial expert profession, training and qualification/licensing of judicial experts, etc The current practice of forensic institutions has revealed a number of inconsistencies between various parts of the existing legal framework regulating the forensic expertise and forensic organization in Moldova, that require alignment and convergence among them. The problems faced by the forensic institutions are apparently due to either the ambiguities of norms, or lack of specific regulations, or different application of norms. In this regard, UNDP is seeking to hire a national consultant to review the current Law on the Judicial Expertise and the Status of Judicial Expert and connected normative acts, identifying shortcomings and formulating improvements with regards to the acts regulating the area of judicial expertise and experts. [1] Law on the Judicial Expertise and the Status of Judicial Expert adopted on 14 April 2016, entered into force on 10 December 2016: http://lex.justice.md/md/365259/ Scope of work
The expected output for the national consultant’s assignment is to review the current Law on the Judicial Expertise and the Status of Judicial Expert and connected normative acts, identifying shortcomings and formulating improvements with regards to the acts regulating the area of judicial expertise and experts,[1] taking into consideration best European practices in the field. In order to achieve the stated scope of work, the Consultant shall perform the following tasks and activities:
For detailed information, please refer to Annex 1 – Terms of Reference. [1] The proposals for review of the regulatory framework shall cover, but will not be limited to, clarifications on the status of forensic expertise performed by foreign forensic institutions and/or experts, regulation of forensic waste and chemicals management, establishment of a forensic coordination council [2] National legal consultant to support the legally based use of electronic case management systems by the forensic institutions [3] National ICT Consultant to support the national forensic institutions with specialised technical support and advice throughout the process of elaboration and operationalisation of an e-system for forensic institutions Requirements for experience
Academic Qualifications:
Experience and knowledge:
Competencies:
Personal qualities: Proven commitment to the core values of the United Nations, in particular, respecting differences of culture, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality, language, age, HIV status, disability, and sexual orientation, or other status; Documents to be included
Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications:
Financial proposal
The financial proposal shall specify a total lump sum amount, and payment terms around specific and measurable (qualitative and quantitative) deliverables (i.e. whether payments fall in installments or upon completion of the entire contract). Payments are based upon output, i.e. upon delivery of the services specified in the TOR. In order to assist the requesting unit in the comparison of financial proposals, the financial proposal will include a breakdown of this lump sum amount (including fees, taxes, travel costs, accommodation costs, communication, and number of anticipated working days. | |||||||||||||
2010-2024 UNDP Moldova, Copyright and terms of use |