National Consultant to support the in-depth assessment of the official Crime and Justice Statistics of the Republic of Moldova.Vacancy Number: Pr21/02254
Contacts: Ms. Victoria Muntean. victoria.muntean@undp.orgBackground
The UNDP project “Strengthening Efficiency and Access to Justice in Moldova” (A2J) is a multi-year institutional development project designed to contribute to an increased efficiency of justice services and to improved access to justice of men and women in Moldova, in particular from vulnerable and marginalized groups, through enhanced capacities of forensic institutions to provide qualitative justice services, strengthened capacities of the justice sector actors in the selected pilot areas to provide coordinated response to men’s and women’s justice needs and strengthened civil society able to claim the respect of rights and engage in a constructive dialogue with the justice chain actors. Project interventions will offer and encourage equal opportunity for the participation of men and women. Although important efforts have been deployed during the last years to improve the efficiency, transparency, fairness, and accessibility of the justice sector[1], the justice system still fails to deliver at the level of users’ expectations. Even though justice reform is ranked the fourth in importance by citizens (after healthcare, pension, and education reforms), results matching this expectation are not achieved yet. In Moldova, the court performance is perceived to be poor, 76% of court users expressing negative views, while most respondents tended to state that there have been no changes on the ground during 2015-2017[2]. According to the World Bank’s 2017 Surveys of Court Users[3], the respondents broadly feel that an ordinary citizen is unlikely to get a fair trial (more than 62% share this opinion). Citizens state that rights of disabled persons and of those who have lower income are least observed in the justice system. Access to justice for vulnerable groups remains a key concern. Access constraints for vulnerable groups and a lower mobility of the rural population, combined with longer distances to travel and poor transport network have raised concerns about the impact of the planned court consolidation on access to justice services[4]. This becomes particularly relevant for women and girls[5] and people with disabilities[6]. According to World Bank data[7], low-income groups have lower awareness about the functioning of the court system compared to higher-income groups, and state that the judicial system is least accessible in terms of cost and information. Only 1 in 10 citizens are satisfied with the efficiency of courts, prosecutors, and bailiffs, while unreasonably long proceedings and lack of thoroughness of proceedings are major citizens’ concerns. On the access to court services, respondents said more attention should be paid to making information on cases and court decisions available to the public and making complaint-filing procedures simpler and clearer. Less than half of the respondents reported being able to find the court decision they need. 57% of citizens are not aware of court reforms, while those who are aware, complain about insufficient information. Therefore, despite the ongoing reforms, little progress is felt at the local level by citizens, and the coherent coordination mechanisms among law enforcement, security, and justice institutions for effective administration of justice seem to be lacking at both national and local levels. Men and women, particularly from marginalized or minority groups, are not able to claim their rights and access justice effectively[8]. According to the results of the Barometer of Public Opinion, the justice system in the Republic of Moldova faces a low level of public trust, with only 19,1% of respondents (19,5% men / 18,6% women) trusting the system as per the data available in February 2021[9]. Monitoring the policies, both at national and local levels, remains a main task of the Moldovan Government’s agenda. The demand for quality data for evidence-based policy and decision-making continues to grow. Evidence-based policymaking can only be successful if it is based on a reality which is described by quality statistics. In addition, good evidence-based policies responding to the financial crisis require a good basis of statistical data as well as the appropriate literacy on using those data. High-quality statistics are necessary for formulating realistic strategies and policies, setting targets, measuring, and managing results, monitoring outcomes, and for making evidence-based decisions about allocation and management of scarce resources. This is true for the justice sector, where sound decisions and actions require high-quality statistics. Accurate and up-to-date statistics and information provide a better understanding of policy impacts.[10] Criminal justice statistics assist in policy analysis within criminal justice systems and as part of other social and global policy formulation and planning. Finally, good criminal justice statistics are essential for understanding and trying to shape the social development of communities. In the context of the Association Agreement between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union (under Title IV, chapter 6 Statistics), the national statistical system should respect the UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics[11], taking into account the acquis in statistics, including the European Statistics Code of Practice[12], in order to align the national statistical system with the European norms and standards (Article 41). The A2J Project seeks to address the crime and justice statistics[13] through an assessment of the gaps in relation to compliance of the Moldovan statistics to the European and UNODC standards in the relevant statistical areas. The identified gaps and recommendations aim to strengthen the capabilities of the NBS and other data producers for effective approximation to EU norms and UNODC standards. According to the latest survey on user satisfaction with available statistics[14], statistical information from the justice sector is most frequently used for the purpose of overall informing by the local public administration, followed by international organizations and mass-media. According to the same survey, the CSOs underlined the insufficient level of disaggregation for the justice statistics, this type of statistics being the most used for professional purposes by the CSOs, LPAs, think-tanks, and researchers. Moreover, when considering the weaknesses related to the justice statistics, the data users noted[15] the lack of promptness of data dissemination and lack of methodological explanations, as well as the low level of trust in these statistics. The Moldovan official statistics in the field of crime and justice (mainly based on official, aggregate figures from administrative sources) provides data which seem to be reasonably accurate and relevant to the needs of national users, but which may not be necessarily internationally comparable because of certain factors. Among them there are the methodological differences which might exists conditioned by the national needs and specific features, as well as different mandates of the institutions which produce data for a specific purpose, weak institutional memory, or lack of metadata repository of the definitions, methodologies and tracking of changes made over time. All these affect the completeness, relevancy, and coherence at the national level. Moreover, the lack of a national classification of crimes transposing an international standard, in particular the International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes (ICCS), is the core impediment in ensuring the international comparability of Moldova’s crime and justice statistics. It is important to identify and gradually resolve these problems by exploring various approaches, harmonization with the existing standards in the field and learning from EU member countries’ experience. Crime and justice statistics[16] disseminated by NBS refer to data on the level of crime in the country (offenses and perpetrators), including juvenile delinquency, convicted and detained persons, road accidents and the justice system (cases brought to the courts and legal professionals). NBS disseminates a concise list of crime and justice statistical indicators through its web-site[17], databank Statbank[18], periodic releases or other modalities. To ensure the production and dissemination of crime and justice statistics, the National Bureau of Statistics collects only the data on administrative contraventions, while the other field-related data are received, according to the annual Statistical Work Programmes approved by the Government[19], in aggregated format, from the holders of administrative data registers, such as: Ministry of Internal Affairs and subordinate authorities such as the Information Technology Service, General Police Inspectorate, Ministry of Justice and its subordinate authorities such as Court Administration Agency, National Administration of Penitentiaries. An in-depth evaluation of the statistical capacity available in the country should be conducted with the full cooperation of the data producers and users, which will provide a detailed assessment of the system’s strengths and weaknesses in the selected areas of concern. The resulting conclusions should also suggest where and what kind of improvements are most needed. In this regard, UNDP is seeking to hire a National Consultant to offer support to the International Consultant engaged within the A2J Project to conduct an in-depth assessment of the official Crime and Justice Statistics of the Republic of Moldova and its adherence to the EU Statistical Requirements Compendium and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime standards. [1] Introduction of a redesigned legal aid system, optimization of court map, implementation of Integrated Case Management System (ICMS), audio recording of court proceedings, reform of prosecution service, etc. [2] World Bank, Moldova - Improving Access to Justice: From Resources to Results. A Justice Sector Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (Report No. 124516-MD), 2018, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/683491537501435060/pdf/Moldova-JSPEIREnglish-Version-Sep-13-2018.pdf [3] Association Implementation Report on Moldova (03 April 2018), [4] Idem [5] A 2011 UN study found that 63% of women had experienced psychological, sexual or physical violence from their husband or partner. Rural, elderly, separated or divorced women are at higher risk of experiencing violence. According to 2017 statistics, 89% of family related crimes registered by Police10 refers to domestic violence, 80% of victims of domestic violence are women, while 90% of aggressors are men (http://www.politia.md/sites/default/files/ni_violenta_in_familie_12_luni_2017.pdf). [6] In February 2016, the UN Special Rapporteur stated that “persons with disabilities are often denied procedural accommodation in court, while the accessibility of court buildings and services themselves remains a serious challenge” in Moldova. [7] World Bank, Moldova - Improving Access to Justice: From resources to Results. A Justice Sector Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (Report No. 124516-MD), 2018, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/683491537501435060/pdf/Moldova-JSPEIREnglish-Version-Sep-13-2018.pdf [8] Report of the Regional UNDP Rule of Law, Justice, Security and Human Rights Mission to Moldova (October 2017). [9] Barometer of Public Opinion, October 2020February 2021 https://ipp.md/2021-02/barometrul-opiniei-publice-februarie-2021/ [10] World Bank, Moldova - Improving Access to Justice: From Resources to Results. A Justice Sector Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (Report No. 124516-MD), 2018, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/683491537501435060/pdf/MoldovaJSPEIR-English-Version-Sep-13-2018.pdf [11] https://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/gp/fundprinciples.aspx [12] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/quality/european-statistics-code-of-practice [13] For the scope of the assignment crime and justice statistics will include crime, criminal justice, civil justice and contraventions statistics [14] Survey regarding statistical data and information users level of satisfaction with the existing sources of information elaborated for: Support to confidence building measures, United Nations Development Programme, by S.C. Magenta Consulting S.R.L. , June 2016, https://statistica.gov.md/public/files/despre/evaluare_opinii/Evaluare_Magenta_Consulting/Magenta_Consulting__Data_users_satisfaction_survey_raport_eng.pdf [15] Sondaj de opinie privind gradul de satisfacere a utilizatorilor cu date statistice ale BNS, Centrul de Investigații Sociologice și Marketing „CBS-AXA”, 2013, https://statistica.gov.md/public/files/despre/evaluare_opinii/CBS_Axa_2013/Rezultate_sondaj_2013.pdf [16] For the scope of the assignment crime and justice statistics will include crime, criminal justice, civil justice and contraventions statistics [17] www.statistica.gov.md [18] www.statbank.statistica.md [19] https://statistica.gov.md/pageview.php?l=ro&idc=323& Scope of work
The expected output for the National Consultant’s assignment is to support the UNDP International Consultant[1] by providing substantive and administrative support, in the process of carrying out the assessment of compliance of crime and justice statistics area in line with the international standards in the field, in particular of the Manual for the Development of a system of Criminal Justice Statistics[2] developed by the UN as a general framework for the development of a national system of crime and justice statistics. The Consultant is also expected to contribute alongside the UNDP International Consultant in designing a Roadmap of actions and measures necessary to further comply with the above listed and other standards belonging to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime[3], as well as to approximate to EU Statistical Requirements Compendium[4] . The assignment will be conducted in close cooperation with the National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova (NBS) and main data providers, building on the previous and on-going activities undertaken by NBS, and closely observing the provisions of the Law on Official Statistics[5], Annual Statistical Work Programme[6], Statistical Strategy, RM-EU Association Agreement (title IV, chapter 6, art. 41-46)[7] and other national and sector policy and regulatory documents and in compliance with international standards in statistics and relevant best practices of other countries. In order to achieve the stated objective, the Consultant will have the following responsibilities:
For detailed information, please refer to Annex 1 – Terms of Reference. [1] International consultant to conduct in-depth assessment of the official Crime and Justice Statistics of the Republic of Moldova and its adherence to the EU Statistical Requirements Compendium and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime standards [2] https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/SeriesF/SeriesF_89e.pdf [3] https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/crime-and-criminal-justice.html [4] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/ks-gq-21-006 [5] https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=105689&lang=ro [6] https://statistica.gov.md/pageview.php?l=ro&idc=323& [7] https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=83489&lang=ro Requirements for experience
The contractor’s performance will be evaluated against the following criteria: timeliness, professionality, proactiveness, communication, accuracy, and quality of the products delivered. Any person applying for this Bid shall have a certain profile in terms of qualifications, skills and special professional experience required to carry out the assignment. The candidates shall have the following relevant skills, qualifications and experience: Academic Qualifications:
Work experience:
Competencies:
UNDP Moldova is committed to workforce diversity. Women, persons with disabilities, Roma and other ethnic or religious minorities, persons living with HIV, as well as refugees and other non-citizens legally entitled to work in the Republic of Moldova, are particularly encouraged to apply. Documents to be included
Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications:
Financial proposal
The financial proposal shall specify a total lump sum amount, and payment terms around specific and measurable (qualitative and quantitative) deliverables (i.e. whether payments fall in installments or upon completion of the entire contract). Payments are based upon output, i.e. upon delivery of the services specified in the TOR. In order to assist the requesting unit in the comparison of financial proposals, the financial proposal will include a breakdown of this lump sum amount (including fees, taxes, travel costs, accommodation costs, communication, and number of anticipated working days). | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010-2024 UNDP Moldova, Copyright and terms of use | |||||||||||||||||||||
